M&S challenges the government’s decision on its Marble Arch redevelopment proposal.
- The Art Deco building’s demolition was intended for modern redevelopment.
- CEO Stuart Machin criticises the decision on sustainability grounds.
- Operations Director Sacha Berendji calls the decision a misinterpretation of planning policy.
- Environmental concerns and heritage issues are central to the government’s rejection.
M&S has initiated a legal dispute in reaction to the government’s refusal to approve its proposal to redevelop the Marble Arch site. The company intended to demolish the existing Art Deco structure on Oxford Street, London, aiming to modernise an area described by CEO Stuart Machin as “aged and labyrinthian.” This legal challenge stems from the belief that the government has incorrectly applied planning policies.
Michael Gove, the Secretary of State, dismissed the redevelopment plans in July, citing concerns that the public advantages did not outweigh potential harm to nearby historical landmarks and conservation zones. The project’s environmental impact, particularly its carbon footprint, and its lack of reusing current resources, such as repurposing existing buildings, were also significant reasons for the rejection.
Stuart Machin argued against the government’s sustainability concerns, labelling them “nonsensical.” He claimed that the proposed building would be among the top 1% of the city’s most sustainable structures, citing its reduced energy consumption, significantly lower water usage, and a carbon payback period of 11 years post-construction.
Sacha Berendji, M&S’s Operations Director, stated that the legal action is necessary to counter what he described as a “misguided agenda”. He reinforced the retailer’s commitment to contest the decision to the fullest extent, highlighting the company’s stance on overcoming what they perceive as an unwarranted barrier to progression.
M&S remains resolute in challenging the government’s decision, pursuing legal avenues to support its redevelopment vision.
